Archive for Forum.ChesterGames.co.uk The official forum for the Chester Games Club
 


       Forum.ChesterGames.co.uk Forum Index -> Club Business
metagaia

One-Off Random Game-Shuffle

might move this to future games if it decided for definite

Last Monday Ian voiced the idea (probably his, correct me if I am wrong) of a quick 2-3 week session of randomly allocated games, in order to mix up some of the groups a bit, since the same groups play amonst each other not because of 'cliqueiness' but probably because all the games finish at different times.

Ian suggested that a number of GMs prepare quick games for different systems lasting 2-3 sessions, then all the players are assigned randomly (from those that wish to do this).  I like the idea and the elegance of it's simplicity.

Obviously, even if the idea is given the go ahead, there are still details that need to be ironed out, like the date that it would start (I would prefer April, at the earliest.) and GMs need to come forward with games (I would also propose that if there are too many GM's then some are reassigned as players randomly).

Therefore, this thread is not a formal and final organisation, but merely a soapbox to discuss the idea, especially for those who are not currently at the club in person.

As for my personal thoughts; I quite like the idea myself, and would support it in the guidelines given above.  I also think that it would best overlap with the idea of the boardgame night, thus meaning there shouldn't be a board game night for awhile after this.  Also, I would like to express my interest in GMing a quick D&D (3.5 or 4E) adventure within that context.

Apologies for the long post!
ian jones

points i think may want to be concidered.

1) numbers of (willing) gamers should be counted and then worked out as to how many games there will be. example 20 people , 4 games of 5 or 5 games of 4.

2)once we have worked out how many games there shall be we then have a maximum limit of gm's

3)anybody wishing to be a gm should put down their name and if more gm's than games, they should be drawn from a hat and the unlucky ones given first choice next time around.

4)all games should last equal amounts of time, therefore any gm's should have an aproximate idea of what they entend to do, for arguements sake say 3 sessions/ or one off taster mission. (so normal gaming can resume at the end)

5)as some people arrive and depart together they may wish to be kept together so that they do not have to wait around.

6)some players may wish to not play a certain genre of game, or with a certain player, for that reason they should have the option of not playing if picked?
metagaia

ian jones wrote:
points i think may want to be concidered.
<snip>
Ok, good points, and my thoughts on those:

1) Indeed, partial point of this thread

2) Yup

3) Agree with the first part, second part I am a little concerned about, as it would discrimiate a little against those who come to the club inbetween.

4) Indeed.  Any game lasting longer than that would at best be put on hiatus

5) Not keen on that really, it's kinda against the spirit of the whole thing

6) I am hoping that people aren't that fussy and willing to give anything/one a second chance.  However, in that case I would propose that all those unhappy (and only those) would have *one* redraw only, to prevent cherry picking.
Shaphron

I'd agree with MG here, picking who you play with in any form is kinda against the whole point of the exercise. If you come/go with someone, I'm sure you odn't mind if you wait a bit for them - I know Matt and I don't mind when we take Leigh home, and I believe he doesn't mind if we take longer than him to finish.

If there's someone you really don't want to play with, maybe you should reconsider joining in, if it will upset you that much. While, like any normal person, I have certain people I prefer to play with and certain people I'd prefer not to play with, I can't think of anyone at the club I would specifically *not* play with, if you do have someone like that then maybe it needs talking over between you and them? I'm not sure, but I can't see how playing a game for 3 weeks would necersarily put too much of a strain on anyone, even if you didn't like one of the other players, as you know it's only going to be for a short period of time and can ignore any bad habbits which put you off based on that premise.

With regards to number of GMs, I think it may be simply resolved by working out how many are needed - by any method mentioned above, then asking for volunteers. I think you'll find that if we get too many volunteers you'll get someone there willing to bow out this time without having to use a hat, and we wont know until after if it's succesful, so we don't want to be promising first pick next time until we know if theres going to be a next time - I'd say take each instance on it's own, and trust in people to be fair - ie if Matt 1 bows out this time, maybe Matt 2 will bow out next time without prompting, to try to be fair. I don't think we need to regulate this, trust people to be sensible.

Planning this for April gives everyone notice to get there games in order by that time, so no-one can say they weren't prepared for it. Maybe we should start the organising now, let everyone  be aware of the idea and get an idea of how many people are interested this monday, and say we're preliminarily planning it for April so don't panic now!
dead

I asked around last monday and one person expressed any reservations, I think I spoke to everyone there. April sounds good as it gives people time to get prepared and I was asked to delay it a month or so to give the D&D group time to get back into the game.

The idea is to get everybody out of their comfort zone somewhat. People tend to sit and play/run similar games with similar groups all the time. By doing this you will be trying something new with new people. You never know you might like it or it may confirm that you dont want to do that ever again.

I mentioned 2 weeks last week as it seems like a reasonable amount of time. Will probably require people to play pregen characters though. If the general feeling is for 3 weeks then we can run with that.

I would like to give preference to any new GM's out there actually, it a perfect time to give it a go if youv always fancied running but never had the guts.

Ian
metagaia

I agree with pretty much everything that Shaphron and Ian have said.  I would prefer 2 weeks, but I would like it to be extended to 3 if necessary.  Since while the GMs should be aiming for 2 weeks, it seems difficult to get the length right even for experianced GMs, never mind those of us new to it.

If April is the target, then I would aim for a preliminary list of GMs by the first week of March, to give the GMs a chance to prepare, especially if the adventure is written by them.
dead

metagaia wrote:
If April is the target, then I would aim for a preliminary list of GMs by the first week of March, to give the GMs a chance to prepare, especially if the adventure is written by them.


Sounds like we have a volenteer to organise then Very Happy

Ill run DOOMED!!! for a group but Im happy to drop out if there are too many of us.

Ian
metagaia

dead wrote:
Sounds like we have a volenteer to organise then Very Happy

Ill run DOOMED!!! for a group but Im happy to drop out if there are too many of us.

Ian
Curses, should have seen that one coming.  Wink

Out of interest, what is DOOMED!!!?  Its title makes it a little difficult to google.
dead

Uses Silhouete rules. Based around a gameshow where you play convits who get dumped on an island. Winners get the winings get set free, losers are DOOMED!!!. Near future, very silly, probably quite short.

Ian
Death Jester

I would say 2 or 3 weeks with a boardgames night the week after. that way if a game over runs a week then people dont miss out signing up for new games. Sound fair?

I dont mind organising it. Will be there next week. And can get gms sorted and draw players and such.

Been really ill for the past few weeks so not managed an appearance for a while Sad
Teflon Billy

Death Jester wrote:
Been really ill for the past few weeks so not managed an appearance for a while Sad


Sorry to hear that.

metagaia wrote:
... Ian voiced the idea (probably his, correct me if I am wrong) of a quick 2-3 week session of randomly allocated games ...


I would kinda prefer two weeks for the first time around. Maybe if it works out well, extend it for the next time.

Out of interest, how many people have signed up so far?

Very Happy .
dead

Unless someone did it last night we have not taken sign ups yet. Everyone I spoke to bar one said they would participate.

Ian
metagaia

I believe Shapron gathered a list of preliminary interest at the same time as treasury collection.  She will know better than I if anyone is opposed to it.

I have to agree with Simon after Monday, 2 weeks is the real aim, and I would rather then get back to my current campaign ASAP, rather than spend another week on board games.  The board game evening is meant to break up the montony of long adventures and sma e groups, not extend it.
Death Jester

The point would be that if a game did over run then it wouldn't be causing problems if there was a board games night. If all games finish on time then thats fine.
dead

I think most games could cope if one of their players wasnt available for a week. I dont think people want another 3 week slot when we are not playing their main game.

Ian
Kamikazegerbil

When are we actually going to go about deciding who's GMing for this? We could do with a definate idea sooner rather than later so GMs have time to prepare.
metagaia

Well, I was hoping that we could get a list at the club on Monday, and assuming we have enough, that should give the GM's 3 weeks to prepare, which should hopefully be enough.

I am willing to do a GM slot, but will have to put some thought into what I wan to GM (likely as I will have to order it)
metagaia

Well, after thinking about it, I decided to do a Savage Worlds scenario loosely based on Firefly (bounty hunters in space etc), though not actually Firefly itself.

No-one else at Paz's game seemed interested in GMing, though I didn't really speak to anyone else; which means so far I have the following list:

Ian:DOOMED!!!
Chris: Savage Worlds

If anyone else is interested in GMing, let me know here or at the club on Monday, and ideally prod other people as well   Very Happy

Shaphron: you mentioned on Monday that you would prefer it to be mid-April IIRC, can you confirm that?
Tess

...I am thinking of daring to be brave and... * Surprised GASP Surprised * ...be a GM for my first ever time playing 'monsters and other childish things' - though I'm a bit worried that this might be the kinda game which some people would love and others wouldn't get into.

hmmm, what do people think, I'd like a bit of direction on it.

T
Kamikazegerbil

I will offer up the playtest of my Bleach RPG for this. One problem I can see is that being a playtest it will be an incomplete game (to use computer game lingo consider this and Alpha version) and I'll be hoping for honest, constructive opinions. I can understand that some may not like the idea of doing so.
metagaia

Tess wrote:
...though I'm a bit worried that this might be the kinda game which some people would love and others wouldn't get into.
I wouldn't worry too much about that.  As far as I can see, the point of this is to let people try different systems, which they may or not like.  If they did play it before and didn't like it, then maybe with different circumstances they will  Very Happy It certainly looks fun to RP with the monsters, and I love the 'height and width mechanic (assuming RPGnet described it properly).
Kamikazegerbil wrote:
I will offer up the playtest of my Bleach RPG for this
It sounds good to me, especially since at the level you'll probably be running it at, it doesn't need to be finished.  I wouldn't mind having a quick look at the rules myself once the playtest is done  Wink

Assuming Tess and Matt are ok with that, then we have a preliminary list as follows:
Ian: DOOMED!!!
Chris: Savage Worlds
Tess: Monsters and Other Childish Things
Matt: Bleach RPG

We will definitely need rough numbers of the people doing it by next Monday, since that affects the number of GMs.  If we have 20 people (including the GMs) then we probably want 4 GMs (=4 players/game).  If we are looking at 30 or so, we will want 5-6 GMs; so does anyone have an idea of approximate numbers?
Shaphron

First dates - On the bank holiday monday, the 13th of April, at least half the club will be away dragon eventing, so the currentl plan was to have it the 2 weeks following that (20th & 27th of April) as most people I spoke to wanted to join in, but would prefer it to be later. If it is required to be earlier the 2 weeks preceeding that date would also be ok (30th March and 6th April).

I do have an approximate number of people interested - it is pretty much the whole club - even those who were reticent to start havce since said they would join in. It's an avarage of 25 people (ish). I will count up and deliver a proper number on monday for your edification. Hopefully Monday will also see the aquisition of register and finance book - I am going to take the money out of club funds as no-one has objected and they are directly for the club.

I belive we will end up with more GMs than necersary - Matt has said he may be willing to GM for this, and I may have gotten around to sorting my murder mystery planned game, which would work well for this also.

And K.Gerbil, the only reticence I owuld have about your plan is that it is a randomly picked game, so you may get people playing who do not want to go in a playtest. Although if you ran it at a different time I would be willing to play! (I've heard that Bleach is kinda similar to Naruto? Or at least, if you are into one then you needn't bother with the other...)

Shell
Kamikazegerbil

It's preciscly because of the random factor that it being a playtest bothered me. It will have a thin plot and be short run but still may not be for everyone. End of the day if we have to many I'll happily step down first. Either way I'm probably going to try playtesting it at the club more than once anyway so it's no big.

As for similarities to Naruto it's the same in Style and tone and generally where one is mentioned I've heard the other recommended. But I'm getting off topic.
metagaia

Shaphron wrote:
First dates - On the bank holiday monday, the 13th of April, at least half the club will be away dragon eventing, so the currentl plan was to have it the 2 weeks following that (20th & 27th of April) as most people I spoke to wanted to join in, but would prefer it to be later. If it is required to be earlier the 2 weeks preceeding that date would also be ok (30th March and 6th April).

I do have an approximate number of people interested - it is pretty much the whole club - even those who were reticent to start havce since said they would join in. It's an avarage of 25 people (ish). I will count up and deliver a proper number on monday for your edification. Hopefully Monday will also see the aquisition of register and finance book - I am going to take the money out of club funds as no-one has objected and they are directly for the club.

I belive we will end up with more GMs than necersary - Matt has said he may be willing to GM for this, and I may have gotten around to sorting my murder mystery planned game, which would work well for this also.

And K.Gerbil, the only reticence I owuld have about your plan is that it is a randomly picked game, so you may get people playing who do not want to go in a playtest. Although if you ran it at a different time I would be willing to play! (I've heard that Bleach is kinda similar to Naruto? Or at least, if you are into one then you needn't bother with the other...)

Shell


Thanks!  That all sounds good to me!  With 25 people you will probably want either 4 or 5 GMs depending on what size groups the GMs want.

With regards to Bleach, it is a valid point, so it's probably best to see if anyone else wants to come forward on Monday.   Confused

I agree that the register should be bought out of club funbds.  It would be unfair to make the Treasurer shell out (pun vaguely intended) for one, and it will make the job a lot easier.  If anyone does have an objection though, now is the time to state it.

Yes, Bleach is kinda similar to Naruto, in that they are both boy-action anime, I would say that Bleach is probably a little more silimar to DBZ though, especially with the way they are chucking energy beams around nowadays.
Shaphron

I haven't watched and Dragon Ball Z since it started - I did watch it when it first started, but then it got a bit woerd and I couldn't follow what the hell they were talking about half the time, even if I did enjoy it. Then I went to uni, so didn't watch it then (no TV for long time) so I'm a bit fuzzy on it now.

Love Naruto. but you're right, I think I am getting off topic. See you Monday!
Tess

Hoom. If anyone else wants to GM I'm actually quite interested in the savage worlds games and wouldn't mind trying my luck at ending up in that! (plus it means I can put off GMing for a little longer!!!)
paz

Tess: Don't drop out, your game is one of the ones I'm most keen on! I don't know what Bleach is (other than something for cleaning floors) and I've never watched Firefly/Serenity. Doomed sounds pretty good, but 'Monsters' sounds great!
Tess

YAY! - Support!

Ooh Noo! - This means I'm actually gonna have to do it!
Shaphron

Tess wrote:
YAY! - Support!

Ooh Noo! - This means I'm actually gonna have to do it!


Ahh, suck it and get a backbone - you'll be fantastic
HDimagination

'Spose I should chime in.

If we need a fith GM, I am happy to run a 4E game (the same one I ran at conception, but out of the people who went only shell was in it).
Tess

I FOUND SOME BALLS!!!!!

I am actually finally really looking forward to running my monsters game and fell asleep thinking about the setting I'm gonna use last night  Very HappyVery HappyVery Happy

Woot Woot!
ian jones

you found balls? is there something you havent told us?
well i think you pass very well for a lady and think if you keep up with the tablets the nhs would have to allow the full op.
Laughing
Shaphron

Official list of GMS:

Ian M - running DOOMED!
Chris - [meta's edit]Savage Worlds (Sci-fi Setting)[/edit]
Tess - running monsters and other childish things
Matt P - running a 4th edition scenario with new classes/races (such as barbarian and warforged)
Robin - running a playtest of a d20 / golden axe crossover thing

At last count there were 30 members of the club, most of whom are regular, and all of whom have agreed to the lucky-dip game (although some under protest). So the GMs should expect about 5 players per game, although they may vary between 3 and 6, depending on if everyone turns up and if we get any new people joining between now and then.

The date will be the monday after the bank holiday. The bank holiday is April the 13th, so the Monday after is the 20th. This gives you GMs just over 3 weeks (from today) to get everything sorted. Make sure your game is playable for the number of players possible.

Players will be drawn early on Monday the 20th, out of a hat. I can see no problem with each player having 1 veto, if they end up in a game they really don't want to play - but don't think you'll be able to pick which group you do end up in, you'll just be able to veto the first one you're picked for if you really don't want to do it. I'd suggest 7:30pm as the time for picking names out of hats, so if you really care make sure you show up by then or inform someone you trust of any game you really don't want to play.

I hope everyone enjoys themselves!

Shell
Death Jester

What is the length? as i could save my monies to make it down for a short stint.
metagaia

Online again *at last*.  These 2 weeks have been irritating!

Death Jester, as afar as I am aware it is for 2 weeks (at least, 5 hours is the gameplay target I am aiming for).  I don't think there were any real protests to make it longer than that.
paz

So, how is this going so far? Who GMed for who in the end? Is there any point me coming next week (if it's even possible for me to make it)?
Tess

hiya, it might be worth coming down as I might be a man (or should I say ginger hair 8 yr old girl) down. If not I think there are others who may want to just play board games.
Shaphron

Not all games were filled, some with pregens, so you may be able to slot yourself ain. Also, if any of the players coulnd't make it the second week spaces will be open. All 5 games are running, we were about 5 people short of haing each one full, but it went really well. Ian tried to interfer with the organising, but Josh and I managed very well with our own plan  Razz
dead

Shaphron wrote:
Ian tried to interfer with the organising, but Josh and I managed very well with our own plan  Razz


Eventually

I can take new bodies in mne if you are there earlyish

Ian
JimZ

Hmm.. I think our characters might be a little suspicious of more people to share the prize money in game with if/when we find it... Razz

Having said that, the more the merrier once the carnage begins  Laughing
Tess

....prize money???

Have I missed this somewhere?
JimZ

Unfortunately its only in game money (Ian's game Doomed)... and even that only assuming we survive (which *might* not be that likely)

sorry for any confusion Razz
paz

I should be at the club at my normal time (19:15ish) tonight; if I'm the only one who wasn't there last week then hopefully I'll slot in to one of the games if that's OK.

I'll also bring some board games, in case there's a few people without a game; I guess it will be a lot easier for us just to make a new table rather than disrupting most/all of the existing ones.
metagaia

Well, I believe that is over and done with (at least for my table) and I did enjoy myself.  Though I did learn that attempting to write my own adventure was more stressful than just using a prepublished one.  Rolling Eyes

If I have one regret about my time, it was that I didn't get as many 'new' players as I hoped.  There is a significant percentage of the club that I have never RPed with, and I only got two people out of the regular group!  I suppose in that sense it made it more fun though, just because it was a new position to be in.

If everyone else has enjoyed themselves, I might suggest turning this into either an annual or a bi-annual thing.  Any more than that I believe would be too much, but I think it is a nice way to mix the groups up regularly.

Thoughts?
Teflon Billy

I enjoyed myself, got to try out 4th edition a bit, played with some different people. 'Twas good  Very Happy  .

metagaia wrote:
I might suggest turning this into either an annual or a bi-annual thing.  Any more than that I believe would be too much, but I think it is a nice way to mix the groups up regularly.

Thoughts?


I'd go for bi-annual.
Tess

I'm not sure I would have got the confidence to run my game if it wasn't for being able to use this as an excuse so I'm very happy it happened  Smile

I think the whole shuffle shenanigans counts as a success!

HUZZAH!! to the thinker upper of the idea-er!
JimZ

I really enjoyed it, and while I'm not coming from the perspective of someone who has been in a long campaign I would imagine it provides something of a nice change of pace once in a while.

'Twas good. Smile
Shaphron

I think the mix-up of players os good, and so I'd second (or third, whatever) the idea of making this a bi-annual event.
Kamikazegerbil

Okay well this was mentioned the other night so I thought I'd get the ball-rolling here. It's not a be and end all but we can work out an idea of how soon people want this here to announce at the club and see if folks object. It looks as though early/mid-november might be the way to go to give GMs time to produce something.
metagaia

Early November sounds fine to me.  Do we have a provisional list of interested GMs?
dead

Not yet, was gonna give people a week to think and then will start the list next week

Ian
dedindahed

I'd like a chance to run battlestations, would be best with exactly 4,
and it's a hybrid baord/rpg if people are ok with that.

Should have the Cthulhu inspired expansion by the time of running.
metagaia

I could run another Savage Worlds if anyone was interested in that?
Kamikazegerbil

I'd like to run a Changeling: the Lost game I'm preparing for Conception.
Death Jester

just so people know i would like to come along, as its easier to commit to a couple of weeks (and cheaper) so as i dont come here too often these days can someone txt or call me to let me know when its on?
Teflon Billy

Are the confirmed dates for this 14th & 21st?
dead

Yup 14th and 21st make the most sense.

Ian
Jimmy

14th and 21st of december? if so count me in!
xorsyst

So, what's this all about, and will there still be people wanting to play board games?
metagaia

xorsyst wrote:
So, what's this all about, and will there still be people wanting to play board games?

Random Game shuffle was an idea thought up by...somebody (apologies if you're reading, I really cannot remember who), but really developed by Shell and Ian.

The idea is that since it often occurs that the same groups end up playing with each other (mainly because they are the only one's free when their game finished).  Therefore, we have 2 week games where participants are randomly assigned, which should mean that you get to play with people you haven't done so before.  It also allows new GMs (like myself and Tess last time) a good chance to try GMing without committing to a long run.

A preliminary list of GMs has already been drawn up by Shell, and will probably be posted up at some point.  On the 14th, people will be randomly assigned to one persons game (with one veto if they want it).  After the 21st people will resume their normal activities.

I do not know if any of the games are boards games (mine will be RPG).  It certainly would not be against the rules to play board games, but I warn you from last time the number of people free will probably be quite limited.
Tess

xorsyst wrote:
So, what's this all about, and will there still be people wanting to play board games?


Looking at dedindahed's post earlier the will be a board/rpg hybrid game which you may find palatable...?
xorsyst

Who is dedindahed?  Is it Dave?

We need forum-ID namelabels Smile
metagaia

xorsyst wrote:
Who is dedindahed?  Is it Dave?

We need forum-ID namelabels Smile

Dedindahed is Dave, that is correct.  Very Happy

Broadly I agree with you but I know there are people on the forums who don't wish their name to printed online.

What normally works for me is browsing through to the user's first post.  Often that will have their name in it and afterwords we all assume everyone knows who we are.
xorsyst

Ah - meant the other way round - I want people IRL to wear labels with their forum IDs.  I reckon at least half the people at the club I have no idea what their actual names are anyway.  PS - who are you? Smile
metagaia

xorsyst wrote:
Ah - meant the other way round - I want people IRL to wear labels with their forum IDs.  I reckon at least half the people at the club I have no idea what their actual names are anyway.  PS - who are you? Smile

Chris, Male 5'5", 10st7lb, light brown hair, green coat, screams a bit, was getting secret santa names yesterday.

If you want to learn peoples names, offer to do money collection for Shell, it's the fastest way to learn.  Very Happy
dedindahed

So, can anyone enlighten me as to the process by which my game was excluded from the shuffle list????
Jimmy

evil evil people excluding dedindahed like that!
paz

So, can anyone shed any light on what's going on with this? There's a chance I may make it for those two weeks.
dead

Most people know what games they are in, as you come in the door next week you will get a chance to pick your game randomly.

I think all games bar Daves have the minimum number to play, I think Daves needs one more and mine only has 3 players for the 2nd week.  Come as early as you can my game will be starting fairly early as I have a fair bit to get through.

Ian
paz

So who is running what then? Last time I ended up playing in a game made up mostly of my regular players; would want to make sure that didn't happen again as it kind of defeats the object.

Not 100% sure I can come yet, btw.
metagaia

paz wrote:
So who is running what then? Last time I ended up playing in a game made up mostly of my regular players; would want to make sure that didn't happen again as it kind of defeats the object.

Not 100% sure I can come yet, btw.

Shocked There were only 3 of us there. (excluding yourself)

I seem to have picked up 2 of them for my own game, including Wolves Mat whom I had in the last game shuffle as well, it might be something to possibly consider for next time to try and avoid repeat occurrences, though that would magnify the complexity somewhat.

EDIT:  Shaphron has the proper list, but IIRC it goes:
Chris: Serenity RPG
Shell: WFRP
Hairy Matt: changeling
Jack: D&D 3.5
Ian: ...something...possibly Call of Cthulhu
Dave: ...something else...Cthulhu themed battlestations

I know there is something wrong with that list but I can't remember what.
paz

metagaia wrote:
I seem to have picked up 2 of them for my own game, including Wolves Mat whom I had in the last game shuffle as well, it might be something to possibly consider for next time to try and avoid repeat occurrences, though that would magnify the complexity somewhat.

Do it like the world cup draw! Cool

Pot 1 = GMs
Pot 2 = people normally in game A
Pot 3 = people normally in game B
etc.

Draw one from each pot for each game table in the shuffle.

Just hope you avoid the group of death! Cool
Jimmy

I am fairly sure Shell is not doing CoC and I am also fairly sure Ian is doing Call of Cthulhu
Kamikazegerbil

I am running Changeling: the Lost not WFRP
Tess

Jimmy wrote:
I am fairly sure Shell is not doing CoC


Whether she is or is not I'm sure is none of our business!!
metagaia

Ok, that list now seems right.

I must admit, serious or not, I like Paz's idea a lot!
paz

metagaia wrote:

Chris: Serenity RPG
Shell: WFRP
Hairy Matt: changeling
Jack: D&D 3.5
Ian: ...something...possibly Call of Cthulhu
Dave: ...something else...battletech I think.

Well I'd want to avoid:
Serenity (as I've never seen it, plus I played in Chris's game last time, plus it features three of my regular group - no offence Chris!)
D&D 3.5 (as I play this game all the time anyway)
Battletech (as I've played it several times before and don't like it)

I should be able to make it for the next two weeks, so apart from vetoing half the options I'm happy to be randomly drawn into any of the others Cool
paz

metagaia wrote:
I must admit, serious or not, I like Paz's idea a lot!

Yeah, it's great, until you get drawn to play D&D4E with Portugal in the quarter-finals and lose on penalties.

Wait, what?
dedindahed

paz wrote:

Battletech (as I've played it several times before and don't like it)


That's Battlestations,
Cthulhu themed battlestations!!
paz

paz wrote:
I should be able to make it for the next two weeks

...apart from the fact that I'm feeling too ill to come. Argh! Mad

       Forum.ChesterGames.co.uk Forum Index -> Club Business
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum